Suffragetteback Saturday celebrates the centennial of ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment this month!
|
"The Last Few Buttons Are Always the Hardest" by Archibald Chapin in St, Louis Star, ca. May, 1920 |
When last we checked in back in March, West Virginia had become the 34th state to ratify the amendment; Washington added to the list later that month. Several states had rushed to be among the first to approve ratification; but 36 were needed, and that last one was proving very elusive.
|
"The Hesitating Heroes" by Harry Westerman in Ohio State Journal, ca. June, 1920 |
Even with ratification so tantalizingly close, neither the Republican nor Democratic party platform committed whole-heartedly to it (frankly, they both offered weak tea on most issues). Southern states in particular opposed the amendment; legislatures in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, and South Carolina had officially rejected it.
|
"What Makes the Suff Rage" by Albert T. Reid in The National Republican, by July 14, 1920 |
|
Republican Albert Reid pointed out that those southern states (here portrayed by "'Kunnel' Democracy") were dominated by Democratic legislators and governors. Overall in 1920, Republicans held majorities in 32 state legislatures; Democrats had the majority in only half that number.
|
"Will He Get Away with It?" by Wimmer in various Tennessee newspapers, ca. August 13, 1920 |
Who was going to get credit for giving women the vote must have been at issue.
|
"Yes Or No?" by Ernest Burtt in Knoxville Journal and Tribune, ca. Aug. 13, 1920 |
Connecticut, Vermont, Florida, and North Carolina hadn't taken action on the Susan B. Anthony Amendment; so the deciding vote would come down to Tennessee, where Democratic Governor Albert Roberts called the legislature into special session on August 9. (Here's another one of those ouija board cartoons, and by no means the only one I've seen addressing this specific topic!)
|
"The Anxious Moment When the Ball Rimmed the Cup" by Archibald Chapin in St. Louis Star, August, 1920 |
Ratification passed easily in the Tennessee Senate, 25 to 4. Knowing that the Governor and state Attorney General supported women's
suffrage, opponents in the Tennessee House pulled out all the
stops to prevent passage.
|
A.E. Kromer in Pittsburgh Gazette Times (?), August 19, 1920 |
The vote in the House was very close — tied, in fact — until 24-year-old legislator
Harry T. Burn (R-Niota) changed his vote from nay to aye at the urging, it is said, of his mother.
|
No caption, by Clifford Berryman in Washington Evening Star, August 19, 1920 |
But wait! Don't uncork that champagne — er, sparkling grape juice — just yet, ladies!
|
"Drat That Boy" by Clifford Berryman in Washington Evening Star, August 23, 1920 |
In an effort to throw a monkey wrench into the works 37 members of the Tennessee House hopped a train to Decatur, Alabama to deny a quorum for reconsideration of the resolution, a parliamentary maneuver necessitated by the Speaker of the House. When that ploy failed, they returned and managed to pass a bill nullifying the ratification vote. Tennessee Attorney General Thompson, however, citing a moot attempt in 1870 by the New York legislature to revoke its ratification of the 15th Amendment, declared that reversing a ratification vote was illegal. Gov. Roberts signed the ratification resolution on August 24.
|
"Legal Technicalities" by Bob Satterfield, for Newspaper Enterprise Assn. (Cleveland) ca. July 15, 1920 |
One of the groups
opposing the amendment, the American Constitutional League, was
still not ready to give up. In a case filed in court immediately after ratification, the ACL
argued that all 36 ratification votes by the states were invalid and that the Tennessee Secretary of State was ineligible to perform the constitutionally required step of signing the legislature's action.
The plaintiff was Charles S. Fairchild, acting on behalf of the
American Constitutional League, and the case was argued by attorney
Alfred D. Smith. Justice Frederick L. Siddons first raised the question
of whether he even had the authority to issue such an order, and asked
Smith to go find references and citations to show that he could do so.
Smith returned to court a few hours later with the required
documentation, but the judge still refused Smith’s request to summon the
Secretary of State to show cause why he should not be restrained from
signing the proclamation, and would not issue an order forbidding the
Secretary from signing:
“I hold that the act of promulgating the ratification of the suffrage
amendment is purely a ministerial act. I am averse to issuing a ruling
ordering the Secretary of State to show cause why he should not be
enjoined on the grounds presented here.”
The judge also seemed rather surprised to see that the “antis” were
not just attacking Tennessee’s ratification, which at one time was the
subject of controversy, but all 36 ratifications: “Do you attack the
validity of every legislative act of the States with reference to
ratification ?”
Smith replied: “We do on the grounds, first that Congress had no
right to propose such an amendment, and secondly, because the acts of
ratification were in some instances invalid because the legislatures
which voted favorably were elected before Congress proposed suffrage
ratification.”
A number of Southern States – Tennessee being the only one that
actually ratified – have a rule that a Statewide election must take
place between the time a Constitutional amendment is passed by Congress
and the State legislature can vote on ratifying it. But in June, the
U.S. Supreme Court made a ruling in regard to Ohio’s ratification of the
18th Amendment (Hawke v. Smith, 253 U.S. 221), which has been
interpreted by virtually all legal authorities and scholars as
invalidating all restrictions on any State legislature’s right to ratify
a Constitutional amendment at any time.
|
"Southern Chivalry Isn't What It Used to Be" by John McCutcheon in Chicago Tribune, August 24, 1920 |
Fairchild v.
Hughes made its way to the Supreme Court in January, 1922, and was quickly disposed of. Mr. Fairchild,
wrote Justice Brandeis, "is not an election officer; and the state of New York, of which he is a citizen, had previously amended its own Constitution so as to grant the suffrage to women, and had ratified this amendment. Plaintiff has only the right, possessed by every citizen, to require that the government be administered according to law and that the public moneys be not wasted."
|
"Hats Off, Boys" by Donahey in Cleveland Plain Dealer, August, 1920 |
Meanwhile, U. S. Secretary of
State Bainbridge Colby issued a proclamation on August 26, 1920 that officially declared the 19th Amendment ratified. As far as everybody but the poor sports in the American Constitutional League was concerned, women's suffrage was thenceforth guaranteed by the United
States Constitution.
|
"We Suppose the Disintegration of the Home..." by Jay N. "Ding" Darling in New York Tribune, August 29, 1920 |
No comments:
Post a Comment